Stoat (formerly known as Revolt) is a selfhostable, FOSS replacement for discord [Group chats and voice channels you can join any time].

Cool new name, however not as easy to use in other languages.

Voice chat is stil not officialy implemented.

Self-hosting there. Apparently nothing to do for you if you had already hosted before the name change.

The Android app has unfortunately disappeared (not been updated) on F-droid.

Edit: added short description for clarification

  • renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    18 hours ago

    This seems like a cool project. I especially love the UI’s similarity to Discord, but it still has a long road ahead to be a viable chat platform IMO.

    I’ve been periodically checking in with Revolt Stoat for about a year now, and personally, the two things that I’m waiting for are:

    1. Voice chat - It seems like this is coming, but they had to clean up a bunch or tech debt first
    2. Federation - Self-hosted chat is great, but not being able to talk to other servers is incredibly limiting for a social tool. AFAIK they’re not planning on implementing this. This is likely a deal-breaker for a lot of folks.

    I’m currently running Matrix synapse, and while matrix is kinda a messy ecosystem, it’s really hard to compete with its maturity and adoption in the FOSS / Self-Hosted space.

    Also, not super important, but this blog post reads like it’s AI generated.

    • magz :3@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      i honestly think that if revolt had federation, then it would be the obvious choice for me, but alas. personally i’m still hopeful for polyproto getting off the ground, but the boring realistic choice for the time being is probably something like XMPP + mumble

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 day ago

    I looked at the website and every link and have no idea what it does.

    “Connect with your friends and community” was in a screenshot.

    • Alfredolin@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ah! If you have never heard of it I can tell you: it’s the foss, self-hostable equivalent of Discord. Except we are still waiting for the voice channels.

        • Jayjader@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Syntax highlighting for code blocks is the reason I prefer discord over slack for collaborating and just chatting with friends who know how to code. I imagine some irc clients exist that so the same, but at least with discord I know my recipient is guaranteed to see what I see.

        • ayyo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Compared to some other alternatives, I think the thing it really has going for it is how simple it is. It’s really a drop in replacement for discord, something I actually think maybe my friends that don’t really care about Foss would consider switching to. They’ve told me they don’t want to take the time to learn a new messaging software, I don’t think they’d have to with this.

        • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          24 hours ago

          There’s a wide gap of stuff one can do between IRC and “chat with voice channels”. For example, having a better protocol with better formatting options, a moderation API, better account management, other forms of multimedia (page embeds, images).

      • papertowels@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Wait when I tested revolt a few months ago they definitely had voice channels - was that a beta feature?

        • Alfredolin@sopuli.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yes it needs extra steps if you are selfhosting and is not supported in the third party app clerotri for example. It seemed an hassle enough that I did not try it on my selfhosted instance.

          • papertowels@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Gotcha that does match my impression.

            You’re right though, there’s value in it being a drop-in replacement for discord. Along those lines, I’m very excited for cinny, a matrix discord-like frontend. There’s a PR for voice calls that I check every now and then, the moment that goes in I’ll be trying to convince my friends to hop over.

            • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Why not any of the other Matrix clients? I’ve got some friends on Element with some bridges and it’s pretty much perfect.

              • papertowels@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                The UI of the ones I’ve tried (schildichat, fluffy, element) felt very unintuitive to me. Spaces were really awkward because it was a different paradigm.

                I’m hoping that the familiarity of cinny will help with wider adoption.

  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I wonder who made the legal threats. I suspect it was Element (Matrix), as they are the only ones with a possible to confuse trademark in the same business sector (“Riot” the old name of their webclient).

    • papertowels@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      “Riot” the old name of their webclient

      I mean, by that logic discord has a much more likely claim.

    • 8osm3rka@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I know trademarks don’t work that way, but imagine if it was actually Revolut, the fintech company

      • Lumisal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Somewhere on Lemmy someone said it came out that it was Revolt.tv

        But yeah, I honestly would constantly type Revolut instead of Revolt before, so that was my guess before too.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        You mean the multiple millions of VC money and crypto investments? Absolutely.

        The Matrix foundation also would have plenty of money if it wasn’t just a front for Element and most funds being siphoned off to pay for services provided by Element.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 minutes ago

          Not sure if that is still in their FAQ, but the Stoat devs previously said that they don’t want federation, and if that ever changes they would likely prefer XMPP over Matrix.

          • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            They said they were open to it but they had zero priority of doing it themselves, and essentially “submit a PR if you want it”. A shame really, their interface is great, and such an easy setup. If they implemented either xmpp or matrix I would switch immediately. All of my friends want a discord clone that “just” works, but no one wants to go to this server for this group and then login to that server for that group. They want a single-pane interface like what discord offers.

            Shortsighted to not implement that IMO.