That seems excessive, and I like that.

That should be it, yes

Just to add another side to this - check if you need an LVD - low voltage disconnect. It cuts the connection to the power grid when power goes out.

T480, so not quite as well aged as the x201.

Pretty much everything I have is somewhere between 6 and 15 years old. My wife’s laptop is an x1 yoga gen 2 (2016), my TV’s “streaming box” is an m910q, my servers are a random mix of tmm’s with the newest being p330s and the oldest is a dell from 2013ish. I just cobbled a frankenstein together with parts from 2008 and up, which went to my BIL because he needed a PC and I needed less parts in my office.

Off lease business stuff is an absolute favorite of mine to pick up.

Rocketstor, but I think thats only just below $1k.

That is… Quite the take. Noted.

Seems like both are insufferable.

What makes you say that?

That’s a you problem. I never accepted your attempt to reframe the conversation.

Its what I have said from.the start, I don’t really care about your attempt to reframe it.

No, it’s not.

“Wahhh, its using quotes, that means exact”

Uh huh. Sure thing.

No, I said quite clearly that I’d like to see the comment misquoted.

You then quoted the summary and said “BUT IT USED QUOTES”

They paraphrase. I said that, too. Your complaint is about punctuation, probably the dumbest complaint ive seen on this entire thread.

So cut the crap, stop lying about what I said, and stop pretending that it was an inaccurate summary.

SUMMARY.

Holy shit are you dense.

========================================

Date: 2026-03-15T10:53:32.311868Z Comment ID: https://sh.itjust.works/comment/24299783 Post ID: 519441 Community ID: 45

Just because they are minors, doesn’t make them innocent by default.

The whole article is devoid of details on how these drones are used.

========================================

Whats the prob Bob?

The quoted comments are directly quoted with links.

Libb locked immediately after insulting db0, I would say it was inappropriate to have locked in the first place.

If there was a full review of source text that was summarised by an LLM then it wasn’t needed

You go through every single users comments?

Do you realize how long that would take?

I disagree, its a huge time saver.

This guesswork was done by a black box ran by OpenAI.

Local qwen, summarized with receipts.

Not a question, more a comment/feedback.

I consider libb’s reply less disengaging and more enrage and block, which I consider inappropriate for a mod to do.

Regarding the larger bit with rimu and this post in general (not what my comment was about, but I’ll elaborate since you took the time to do so as well), the issue - for me - comes down to veracity.

I think its perfectly appropriate to call out bad actions. I have no problems whatsoever expressing my disappointment with the FAF when it has come up, which has been rare, and expressed those thoughts without any issue whatsoever. One example being a discussion about defederation, where some of the examples shown should/would have been removed anyway due to the rule breaking contents.

Anyway, for me, claims like this should be met with a pinned post that they haven’t been verified, and each user should review and consider accordingly.

For example - is there a tool using an llm reviewing comments at request of a user? Yes, easily proven.

Is it an automod? No. That claim is unverifiable with what has been shared, and not even remotely indicated by what was shared, making the bulk of this post conjecture.

As for the points (I’m going to skip ones I fully understand and agree with to not make this too long, because I have a feeling you are already occupied with keeping an eye out for rule breaking behavior):

have a mixed opinion on AI. I use it for subtitle or transcript. There are pro and cons. Dbzer0 stated they don’t use it, or run a local one on you computers. I believe them.

Same. They definitely run locally, as do I, the ai horde has been a publicly available tool for a long time. I’m very much against corp. ai, but perfectly fine with local use.

But our post are public and we check user’s history before taking decision.

And most importantly, none of that is different here. Everything else in this post is just wild speculations and blatant fear mongering. Which is the issue I have with this post, and why I think a pinned comment is appropriate.

As for the discussion between Unruffled and Libb, It’s better to let them alone.

Again, I was more referring to their interaction with db0.

Flat out inappropriate, no excuses that are valid there IMO.

Edit: Autocorrect typo corrections

Rimu stays based for calling out them assuming guilty before proven innocent

Can you clarify please?

The tool summarizes, includes references to specific comments, and a person has to review and action.

What “assumed guilt” are you referring to here?

Qwen iirc.

Full comments with direct links are there, thats the summary up top, just scroll down.

Edit: https://faf-pb.xyz/?ab3c4aae88b64dbc#J8jz6mNac8kRHm5aMXBJQjbUr9pbwMfWrdEaNm1jywhx if you want to see for yourself.

Considering the recent actions, maybe reconsider that.

There is no delegation to the tool.

It provides an evaluation in text format, and references. Thats it.

Edit: To be clear, rimu is just making that part up. It has no ability to auto-ban and its not an automod.

Its a python script to check a user’s comment history and evaluate using a local model, and spits out what it finds. A person has to read it and make a decision on this information.

Everything else is rimu’s hallucination.