Decorative, put some smol neat thing in there

Anarchosyndicalism to achieve anarchocommunism eventually

Yeah I like them as well, it’s what we use at work. The article doesn’t leave me optimistic though

It is but they’re working on federation for forgejo (which powers Codeberg).

If you don’t want to host something yourself, check codeberg

Schönes Review, gibt viele meiner Gedanken zu dem Buch wieder.

Und danke für den Verweis auf Bitter, das interessiert mich sehr, kommt auf die Liste.

In deinem Post steht 1.5., ist am 14.5. Klingt aber nach einer sinnvollen Sache!

Ist mein erster Vatertag als Vater und ich werde ihn Zuhause verbringen. 😊

Kommunikation das A und O :)

Wir mähen da, wo wir uns auch auf dem Rasen bewegen, also Wege und Spiel/Liegefläche. Der Rest wird aber eh zu Beeten. Vorgarten nur 1-2x pro Jahr.

Das hat mich auch etwas gestört, weil ich es schade fand dass es für die Revolution dann quasi göttliche Unterstützung brauchte.

Das ging mir das ganze Buch über so mit den “normalen” Engeln. Die Engel dies die Engel das, ohne Engel keine Revolution, solange die Engel da sind ist alles gut, aber darüber, was sie eigentlich machen, wird still geschwiegen. Nicht göttlich, aber eine Art eigene Klasse die die Revolution für den Rest erledigt.

Achtung vager Spoiler: Das fand ich zum Ende aber sehr gut aufgelöst bzw wurde dann endlich in Frage gestellt, so dass ich es im Nachhinein gut fand.

It’s capped at 600, 800 would be peak of the panels but rarely reached.

I don’t get any money for the surplus (with bigger installations it can make sense, in that case you need to get an electric meter that counts both ways).

I’m not sure what you mean with mixing, I got it as a package.

I don’t have the manufacturer of the panels at hand but the inverter is a hoymiles HM600, which is pretty common here.

I’m in Germany, so stuff may differ at your place.

It may depend on where you live. I have an inverter that maxes out at 600W and two panels with 400W each connected to it. The inverter is plugged into a regular socket.

They’re usually tying their identities together themselves. You’re conflating changing your name to match your gender with using pseudonyms and are drawing questionable conclusions from that. Chelsea could also have pseudonyms that we don’t know of where she did/said other stuff but wanted to remain unknown. That’s not the same and doesn’t mean she doesn’t care about privacy. Her being known for the leaks is already something public, she does not hide it. In fact, she clearly says she doesn’t want to be referenced by her deadname as someone else quoted here.

There’s a community guideline “stay on topic” which you clearly violated (though one could argue it’s been violated earlier in that thread). Insisting on calling trans people by their deadname can also easily be seen as transphobic, which is against the general slrpnk rules.

Is there any documentation on how they share user data like emails? That sounds super wild to me

Oh I gotta install that! Still have the sounds in my brain. I just tried to get the three thingies at the top go the most advanced colors instead of going for real objectives (which I didn’t get anyways as s kid).

First, I don’t think calling out/talking about enshittification is off topic on a solarpunk instance. It needs to be identified and addressed to be avoided for our utopia.

I tried to get the gist of your post, you want to keep using Chelsea Manning’s deadname citing questionable reasoning, and the admin deleted your comment? Not your post on enshittification, but your justification for using the deadname?

Most people I know strictly don’t want their deadname seen anywhere btw. They use their new name for stuff they did before as well. That’s not too generalize, people are different, but saying the deadname should be used because they want to start over without looking any further how Chelsea applies it is nonsense. Your reasoning seems pretty far from what people who changed their names for trans reasons usually say about it.

The mod call seems right to me. Calling for a community removal because of one mod decision you don’t like is also usually not the best thing to do.

Die meisten nicht, per Definition

Anarchy has to be many things and some are more often overlooked than others. Some of the replies here show exactly that pointing it out is necessary.

Having all possible aspects of anarchy combined is a rather theoretical thing IMHO. There can always be new things which are used to discriminate people for and create hierarchies around - identifying and overcoming them has to be constant anarchist praxis.

But anarchists are, again and again. And since there’s no perfect anarchy anywhere but always just striving towards it, it’s necessary to point out blind spots. Dismissing that criticism as signalling is ignoring the fact that we have to learn anarchy, it doesn’t just come to us in it’s perfect form.

Lemmy is a small part of the fediverse and the tankie triad is a small part of Lemmy. Barely ever seen that stuff on Mastodon and co.

It doesn’t have to be a conscious decision like “disabled people fuck off”. It’s usually doing something without thinking to whom it’s accessible.

Establish your cool open for all anarchist library in a place not reachable by wheelchair? Excluding disabled people. May have an easy fix, but you gotta think that shit through, ideally before announcing how you’re open for everyone. Just one example.

Most anarchists may be cool about that in theory, but reading reports from disabled anarchists, exclusionary examples are far from being the minority. Masks or filters at indoor gatherings? Alt texts? Some openly published contact where disabled people can ask about meeting their needs? Just some topics that often aren’t though about at all.