I don’t mind that it just forces updates. I think for the vast majority of users that’s the right call, otherwise they just won’t update shit and blame everyone but themselves for when they get viruses and whatnot. Same really for Linux if it becomes popular enough with people who really don’t know about tech.
If I was using Windows I’d want to turn that feature off ofc.
I do mind that it forces updates, in the sense that it decides when it’s going to start downloading them, even if I’m in the middle of things, and also it takes too long while blocking any ability to use the machine while installing. Let me pause the download without waiting an actual minute for the update screen to load, and figure out a way to install them without completely blocking my computer, dammit!
You can just block the update services from the internet and allow it again when you want it to update.
I use an old version of net limiter to do it and it works fine. New version is subscription trash though.
It could definitely be better implemented. Doesn’t it have a system where it starts the download process and stuff when the computer is idle? I think some Linux distros have such a system.
The update is downloaded in the background, and it asks you when to update, most folk just impulsively click later without thinking.
Hell, you can set preffered update hours!
Iirc the issue is that it people click later later later until it just forces itself upon the computer and of course that happens at the most inconvenient time. It should apply it somehow in the background and just automatically switch to that updated version when you next turn it on. So some sort of A/B model perhaps.
Power users and enterprise, that should be disabled by default. But for most users, you really need to force it at some point, even though it sucks
My partner is a little bit technopobic and adopted to Linux 4 years ago. Mint originally as a gentle step and now on Debian KDE. They needed initial set up doing for them eg localisation for Libreoffice. Updates etc are really no different to Windows so they dont need to worry about using the terminal. The challenge for most non-tecchy people will be having someone to hold thier hand with trying and moving to Linux.
So, this is only to some degree Microsoft’s fault, but yesterday, we were basically on a workshop at $DAYJOB to learn about a hardware setup, which had some crucial software on a Windows PC.
And because you can’t run updates in the background on Windows, the internal IT has a nagware program to remind you, that you should stop working and install an update.And like, truly nagware. It pops up in the middle of the screen, overlays all other windows, but also minimizes them, and the only way to close it, is to either go ahead with the installation or to click “Defer”, which makes it ask again in 5 minutes.
It then also unminimizes your windows, but does so in the wrong order, so a different window will end up on top.But what truly made this a unique experience was that there were like 8 updates it tried to install. Each of those updates had its own nagware pop-up with its own 5-minute-timer, so we get one of those ridiculous pop-ups every 30-45 seconds.
Eventually, we did realize that it was different updates it was trying to do (and not just a BIOS update which had failed twice already), so we could make it go ahead with the installation of some of those updates, which reduced the nagware pop-up frequency somewhat.
But yeah, for innocent me with my Linux laptop, this was still absolute bedlam. Just genuinely a moment of “How the hell do you get any work done?”.
I tried windows 11 recently because I couldn’t get a game to work with WINE. Man, what a fucking shit show.
From what I can tell, any windows 11 that isn’t pro version is utter trash. Pro version seems to not have as many issues, based on people bitching about issues I don’t have.
If a studio can’t even be bothered to get their game running through proton, then I can’t be bothered to give them my money.
Nah. Windows is stalkerware digital slavery of the soul. It comes back with shackles. The future will make this far more clearly the case.
Won’t someone think of the investors?
Linux distros can still do…questionable things. In grad school I tried Arch for a bit, and I once was late to a video call because I had updated my kernel but did not reboot. Arch decided that because there was a new kernel installed, I didn’t need the modules for the old — but currently running! — kernel, so it removed them. So when I plugged in a webcam, the webcam module was nowhere to be found.
But yeah…somehow, still not as bad as Windows updates.
That’s how the update process for the kernel works. The currently running kernel and active modules are kept in RAM, while all files on disk are replaced. These new files can’t be used by your old kernel meaning you can’t load new modules.
I wouldn’t call that a questionable thing. Reading through how it happened paints a crystal clear picture of cause and effect.
I think this is the other way around, Windows Updates always fuck up the user.
Lmao winblows I’m gonna remember that moving forward. I think I’ll be getting a lot of use out of it 😄
Wow, you must be one of today’s lucky 10,000!
(the term “Winblows” is like 30 years old. We were trash-talking Windows 95/98 with it 😂).
Have some more:
Micro$oft
Micro$hit
Microsucks
Internet Exploder
Micro$hit was my favourite.
See also: Microshaft Winblows 98 (Video Game)
that op might be a ID-1T or just a 1user. PEBKC
That’s why I always keep the machine offline when I’m setting up, then turn off or disable the Windows Update service first. Then I use the router and the HOSTS file to block every part of Micro$oft.
ok but have you tried linux
Naw man, Linux is too much work
My main machine is now Linux Mint. And I have an Android phone.
Do Linux users still think Windows updates are unreliable? Can’t remember a breaking release, personally or for my users, for 6 or 7 years.
Two days ago Windows Update deleted my Linux EFI boot entry on another disk.
About a year ago an update broke Bluetooth so that I could never add or remove any devices. That had not been fixed last time I tried, several updates later.
About 5 years ago I was flat out unable to update Windows for 6 months, due to what turned out to be a bug when an unknown hard drive was attached.
Slow and randomly fails is my experience.
For me it was more about updates installing junk I didn’t ask for, undoing configurations I’ve made, and resetting my menu customizations.
Otherwise I agree - updates never actually broke my system. They just made me not want to use it anymore.
You must have missed the whole fiasco with OneDrive. I personally know people who are still recovering from that one.
I did miss it! Again, no issues for me or 75 users with varying flavors of 10 and 11.
Yes, because I also have a Windows installation and use it at work. So yeah, I do think it’s unreliable.
When I still used this trash many years ago, it gradually made my PC slower. At that, consistently with every update.
many years ago
Yeah, like I said.
To my knowledge, it still happens. The concept’s called “Windows Rot” and has been there since the 90s. Hey, but maybe adding bloatware like screenshotting your entire screen, every five seconds will magically fix it. Also, Windows has moved away from its own framework for the start menu and has instead used the JavaScript React thingy, result being that if you spam the start menu button, you can saturate your CPU. That’s not a joke.
where linusx
