I’m tired of supporting instances that support that trash. Are there any suggestions or even a good up-to-date list available?

  • INeedMana@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    if you check the link, by default you start out untrusted.

    Well, we can agree to disagree here but I do think this is a good idea ATM. When I see an account posting slop, seo spam or links to stuff that IMO shouldn’t exist in the first place, it’s always an account “registered today-ish”. They might change their MO with time but for now, even with requiring an application message, a new account is often a cat in a bag. Having this slow introduction makes it a bit harder to create harassment accounts in high volume

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      i’m not saying that it’s a bad idea per se, just that with the way the score is calculated you can become trusted in less than a second if you’re a bot while humans can take like a week.

      • INeedMana@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Even with positive score you’d still be under new account timer. Personally I feel that this score means much less than many make out of it

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          it was the fact that it was undisclosed that was the main issue. i imagine most people assume that when there’s a public scoring system, posts with high scores are trustworthy (or to put my finger on it, aligned with the prevailing opinion) and posts with low scores are not. finding out that no, actually some users’ experience is weighted according to the whim of, in their mind, just some guy, suddenly the whole concept of trust (alignment) on the platform goes out the window.