from the mod log:

Mojng5xTnVM7YHd.png

https://s.faf-pb.xyz/lXxek was the old url but they took it down - I have a copy at https://join.piefed.social/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/evidence-llm-used-for-banning.txt

The output from the LLM was provided as proof that someone needed to be banned.

I didn’t want to do this but my hand was forced by their dissembling, minimization and bullshit. Note how the output includes a nice big logo with a slogan and ascii graphics - this was not a one-off experiment, this is an app they were proud to call their own.

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    Look at that, the words don’t match what’s in the quote marks, and it has a slightly different meaning. My whole point.

    I’m almost impressed that you can lie this hard while acting correct.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        Summary, sloppary, whatever you call it: the thing you claimed you could find the exact text for, and then didn’t.

        • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 days ago

          No, I said quite clearly that I’d like to see the comment misquoted.

          You then quoted the summary and said “BUT IT USED QUOTES”

          They paraphrase. I said that, too. Your complaint is about punctuation, probably the dumbest complaint ive seen on this entire thread.

          So cut the crap, stop lying about what I said, and stop pretending that it was an inaccurate summary.

          • XLE@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            I said quite clearly that I’d like to see the comment misquoted.

            That’s a you problem. I never accepted your attempt to reframe the conversation.

            your complaint is about punctuation

            No, it’s not.

            • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              8 days ago

              That’s a you problem. I never accepted your attempt to reframe the conversation.

              Its what I have said from.the start, I don’t really care about your attempt to reframe it.

              No, it’s not.

              “Wahhh, its using quotes, that means exact”

              Uh huh. Sure thing.