from the mod log:

Mojng5xTnVM7YHd.png

https://s.faf-pb.xyz/lXxek was the old url but they took it down - I have a copy at https://join.piefed.social/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/evidence-llm-used-for-banning.txt

The output from the LLM was provided as proof that someone needed to be banned.

I didn’t want to do this but my hand was forced by their dissembling, minimization and bullshit. Note how the output includes a nice big logo with a slogan and ascii graphics - this was not a one-off experiment, this is an app they were proud to call their own.

  • Rimu@piefed.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 days ago

    Ok if this is not a big deal why did it fall to me to blow the whistle on it? Why were they so quiet about it?

    • y0kai [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      9 days ago

      lmao nothing “fell to you” and no one is “quiet” about anything. you just took it upon yourself to take an already public modlog (one that unruffled knows is public) and follow the link that he posted (pubicly, to a page that anyone who has the link can view) and then pretend you found some big secret. this isn’t whistleblowing, it’s closer to fear mongering or some delusion where you think the world needs saving and you’re the valiant hero.

      luminous and unruffled both admitted everything openly and most of the shit in your original post was entirely untrue.

      • misk@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        „Anarchist” mod team delegating work to a non-deterministic tool operated by big tech is the news here. Kind of confirms my understanding of who calls themselves anarchists these days - people who value freedom to consume and freedom to be exploited above actual freedom.

        • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          There is no delegation to the tool.

          It provides an evaluation in text format, and references. Thats it.

          Edit: To be clear, rimu is just making that part up. It has no ability to auto-ban and its not an automod.

          Its a python script to check a user’s comment history and evaluate using a local model, and spits out what it finds. A person has to read it and make a decision on this information.

          Everything else is rimu’s hallucination.

          • misk@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            If there was a full review of source text that was summarised by an LLM then it wasn’t needed. It’s a pointless tool that makes guesswork look very confident. This guesswork was done by a black box ran by OpenAI.

            • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              If there was a full review of source text that was summarised by an LLM then it wasn’t needed

              You go through every single users comments?

              Do you realize how long that would take?

              I disagree, its a huge time saver.

              This guesswork was done by a black box ran by OpenAI.

              Local qwen, summarized with receipts.