• acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    In a political climate where you could actually implement UBI, you would also be able to implement walkability policies.

    Also, e-bikes. E-bikes is where it’s at.

    • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah e bikes aren’t even allowed on the roads for now. The walkability problem is a matter of the billions and billions of dollars it would take to essentially redo every road in the county. Some zoning changes could help a little but we’re generations of work away from being walkable

      • Flauschige_Lemmata@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The trick is to implement temporary measures at first. Like turning a lane into a sidewalk and a bike lane, by placing planters. Then when it’s time to renew the road anyway, the status quo only has one car lane in each direction.

        In that situation there will be both the money and the will to build a grade separated sidewalk and bike lane.

        • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Our roads are already only one lane in each direction. No shoulder, no sidewalks. Sometimes they’re marked as narrow and only one car can get through at a time. It’s a ditch in the side, not grass. People get killed on these roads all the time. Widening the roads means imminent domain land seizures, adding underground waste water runoff capability, and adding all of the infrastructure you’re describing. I won’t see 5% if our roads fixed before I die.

          • Flauschige_Lemmata@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Sometimes they’re marked as narrow and only one car can get through at a time.

            That should be the case every 200m or so, if there is no sidewalk. It’s really effective at slowing drivers down.

            With a speed limit of around 10km/h streets like that can be safe and pretty comfortable for pedestrians

            • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              28 minutes ago

              These are roads big trucks drive at 100kkmh on all day long. Hilly roads with blind curves. No one goes anywhere without a car here.

      • acargitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m being speculative, right?

        In a political climate where you could actually implement UBI, you would also be able to …

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah not in rural areas, we need cars.

      Now, im all for banning bro trucks and crossovers over 3500 lbs. If you cant get by with a miata or a wagon, you have to get a special license for a bigger vehicle and pay more because youre damaging the road and endangering others 10x more in your 10,000lb f350 diesel.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          yeah, reminder that even the USA has an 80% urban population! (below is per-state percentages)

          Half the US population lives in these counties:

          And
          Two out of three people live in the 100-mile border zone