

don’t forget that the copyright holder is perfectly free to sell copies of their software under different licenses, OP could provide the GPL copy for free and clearly advertise that buying it under MIT or a non-open license is available.


don’t forget that the copyright holder is perfectly free to sell copies of their software under different licenses, OP could provide the GPL copy for free and clearly advertise that buying it under MIT or a non-open license is available.


do mind that (and i’m pretty sure this still works with AGPL but this isn’t gospel) you can have the engine be open source while keeping the assets proprietary and requiring they be purchased to actually sensibly play the game.
This is how the original DOOM works, there’s an ocean of modified doom engines but you still have to buy the assets to play the proper actual DOOM game. You can use alternative asset packs but it’ll look and sound like a fairly different game.
And of course it’s vastly easier to create alternative assets for such a simple game, compared to the labour that would be involved in a larger modern game.


china makes loads of the components in your devices, i don’t think they need to get stuff into the kernel to compromise you…
well what are your criteria? Asking for advice without saying what you need isn’t tremendously useful and, as has happened, mostly just results in people recommending whatever they personally use for whatever reasons.
delta absolutely needs an account though, it’s literally email


frankly at this point i wouldn’t be surprised if part of it is literally that it would make people think “oh, things can be better, maybe we should make more things better”.


you can always just host your own fdroid repo, there’s nothing magical about it and it’s trivial for users to add it to their client.


the KDE lock is one of those cabinet locks anyways, where the key is just a removable handle.


as time goes on i become more and more radicalized toward “git should be a fundamental part of human society and taught since childhood”


why would one even bother publishing data where a fifth of it is “unknown”
i looked it up properly and according to https://faculty.washington.edu/dcatling/Catling2009_SciAm.pdf we basically only lose hydrogen and helium, and we do so very very slowly (3kg/s for hydrogen, 50g/s for helium).
Put important things in flood-safe boxes, at least. Or just move them to a place that isn’t at risk of flood.
Idk what level of flooding we’re talking, but maybe you could put in some mitigation measures around your house? Stuff like making sure the ground is angled to send water away from the house and into the street, just digging out retention ponds, removing impermeable surfaces…
If we’re talking BIG floods then yeah ultimately the house will have fish moving in, but it could still buy you time before the water starts claiming the house.
losing more atmosphere to convection? i don’t think that’s how that works


It being stable is in fact kinda why it sucks, it’d be great if it would collapse


your last sentence is willfully ignoring the systematic horrors of AI that can only be properly fought by making AI as a whole socially unacceptable.
To prevent it getting lost i want to point this out in its own top-level comment:
Keep in mind that as the copyright holder you can publish your code under as many licenses as you wish, and charge for whichever licenses you wish.
You could publish it for free under AGPL, charge a smaller sum for developers who want/need a more permissive license like BSD 3-clause, and charge out the ass for a full on proprietary license.
Do note though that you’d have to think about how to handle contributions, as that will be copyright of the respective authors and thus you can’t just merrily go and change the license of their contributions. You’d have to ask them to sign a Contributor License Agreement or just straight up manage the codebases separately (which is a little bit of a mess).