Does anyone run their own AI service?

If so,

Which one?

What hardware?

Do you have a way to access it from outside or from a phone?

And, if you’re open to sharing, what do you do with it?

I know AI-enabling hardware is insanely expensive right now, but some of the smaller (<32GB) more efficient models (think deepseek- or qwen-based) don’t absolutely need specialized hardware to run and perform well enough for many purposes.

I am so aware of the absolutely abysmal privacy practices of basically all AI companies that I’m not comfortable using them to help me with web searches and the such, because there’s no way that all this information won’t be going into a profile. This makes me want to have my own “helper” service.

  • trougnouf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I use Qwen 3.8 27b Q4 with 100k context (llama.cpp and the Mistral AI harness) on a 24 GB AMD Radeon 7900 XTX and it’s been great. It can handle pretty much anything I throw at it and I can let it work indepedently overnight / over days on long tasks.

    • dieTasse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      How much electricity does it burn? And how much does it cost to let it run overnight? I feel like this is the same problem that the companies have, its way too expensive to use it on a lots of things and it is way cheaper to use it on someone else’s server…

      • trougnouf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It uses 261 W, probably more expensive than getting a 2nd Mistral subscription with the cost of power where I live (Belgium), but it will be free heat once I have solar panels and a battery.

    • melfie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I have nearly the same setup, except OpenCode for the harness. I run 200k context for anything that doesn’t need vision, or 150k otherwise. Typically get about 30 t/s decode With MTP, starts at close to 800 t/s for prefill and drops to the 200s for a long context. I’d imagine higher decode speeds are possible with some tinkering, but I haven’t gotten around to it.

      • trougnouf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I get about 45 t/s after some tweaking, getting the thermals under control helped a lot; mainly by reducing the power consumption to 261 W (and downclocking a little bit).

        What vision model do you use?