By the way, I’m the only one of us that ever got upvoted, so sure you won the hearts and minds (who the fuck cares about that lmao) and noone’s reading this shit now

… I don’t care about votes either? Which is why I never mentioned them. Why are you bringing them into in this in the same sentence you establish how much you don’t care about them / the audience reaction? I guess I’m glad we’re on the same page about votes, but it’s weird for someone who supposedly doesn’t care to have brought them up at all.

(Total side note: I don’t know if you know yet, vote totals aren’t the same across instances. Many instances go so far as to defederate from lemvotes (.ml included, I believe), so it can be difficult for users from there to check actual vs. displayed vote totals. This makes it fairly pointless to use vote totals in an argument, (as for example) right now on my client, neither one of us have any up/down votes after our very initial comments.)

You were the one making unnecessary corrections when quoting me to begin with

Nnno? Where did I do that?

you have not provided a single argument against that even onceso I guess you must agree.

Budude, you can do better than this. “I said nu-uh about your arguments, so that means you agree!” is entertaining I’ll grant you, but it’s not exactly well founded. You’re welcome to explain how the definition of censorship doesn’t apply to what .ml does but somehow does to .world, but well, there’s probably a good reason you’re trying to discredit the idea of the definition itself rather than actually engage with the argument.

Good luck becoming an English teacher or something!

Entertainingly I spend far more time lecturing about formal languages than my counterparts in lit. One of those amusing quirks of compsci…