Edit: This seems to have attracted a few eco-fashs :/

  • bss03@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Imma reuse my joke from last time this was posted:

    The Green Revolution deserve AA capability, too!

  • lugal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m sure it’s not even green in any meaningful sense but just slightly greener than the others (if that’s even true). Not that that would really make a difference either way.

  • GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    On top of the other obvious complaints, I think that nobody in their right mind would compromise the performance of an antiaircraft missile to make it relatively less polluting.

  • GraniteM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    If you ride the subway in Washington DC there are posters advertising anti-aircraft systems and other military contract products right next to the ads for car insurance and chewing gum and it’s so fucking weird.

  • Vegafjord oakframer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Theres a comment saying “jokingly” the killing of people reduce emission. First of all, this is eco fascism because although Im sure it is not intentional; A joke forwards an attitude. It is a sightsteer.

    This sightsteer takes on consumerist approach to climate action. However it is important to note that it is might and machine that is poisoning our world, not people. We should put responsibility where it belongs. That way we can plan for actual change, instead of symbolic change.

    • lugal@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They left out the best part: it’s operated by women and children, we finally ended the patriarchy

  • cub Gucci@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Honestly, I know a few jets it could hit, but I don’t think it’s a good way to a solarpunk future.

    • LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The marketing speak, tho. I think that angers me the most. More eco friendly than something that has zero measurable levels of eco friendly, is a low bar. It’s like saying asbestos is more eco friendly than coal carbon emissions, so therefore asbestos is eco friendly and should be celebrated. Theres zero good to their argument.