• Faceman🇦🇺@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Very happy to see this, I thought they were going to be pulling away from self-hostable and more flexible solutions a few years back when they stopped developing things like Unifi Video, but they seem to have made many positive movements towards openness, true ownership and self-hostability lately.

    • WASTECH@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      They mention in the post that other apps are coming soon. If they start letting you self host Protect, that will be huge. When they killed off Video, the only way to get their cameras to work was to buy their hardware that could run Protect. I was shocked when they allowed you to use 3rd party cameras in Protect.

      • Faceman🇦🇺@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        They still push their exclusive features and services in the UI’s pretty hard, but I’m OK with that while they are making moves like this, and letting you have third party cameras mixed into their ecosystem reasonably easily.

  • chargen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    So this is a way to run virtualized UniFi controllers per client? What’s the benefit of this over proxmox+linux hosting?

  • vatlark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    They were working pretty hard to wall their garden. This looks promising but I remain sceptical.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I decommissioned mine, I had it and to access points. When I moved, I replaced it with a dream machine se pro. I really wanted DPI and IDS at my full internet speed. I strongly considered just throwing a bunch of their access points up and crafting a firewall out of a PC. Run ntopng on it. In the end the sweet siren song of a cohesive, single interface, completely managed network won out.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Time, metrics, I have 7 access points, if one starts getting high noise, I get a message and can move it. If I want to put my TV on it’s own vlan, I can see what switch it’s on and what port, change the vlan from my phone in a handful of clicks

          Updates, backups. For their issues, they also have a lot of creature comforts.

          I ran Cisco for years. I spent more time on Cisco in most week than I have post setup on unifi and uniform has more features.

    • Suzune@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ve got Unifi Network installed in a container on my home server. I have also an custom-built router, because it is much more powerful than any appliance and does not cost as much.

  • non_burglar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I am, the UniFi Java blob that runs on MongoDB. I use it for my 802.11ac access points, although not very often.

    I really want to move to openwrt on them (not a big fan of how Ubiquiti treats out-of-support hardware), but I’m scared of taking the big plunge of managing them all with a unified interface. There exist projects to do just this, I guess it’s the work to set it all up.