zpool has very reasonable thresholds for disk failure being enough to kick it from the pool. I’ve seen pool members have a batch of bad blocks and ZFS still chugged along for a few years just avoiding those blocks before the disk finally failed.

Heed truenas here, replace the disk if you can.

I’ve tried it a few times, that kanban plugin sucks. It doesn’t even compete with Microsoft Planner in features.

I’m not being antagonistic, I don’t known where you’re getting that.

Do what you want, I don’t care.

in case you bork an unrelated service

??

Why would borking another service break a bind mount?

This absolutely overkill, just use bind mounts for the arr stack and keep the ZFS pool local.

Last shows how long the last user logged in has been logged in. So if your system routinely has multiple users logged in, this may not be a useful metric.

Well, no… You need to find the geometry of your disk.

Vi is unintuitive and annoying to me.

Totally fair, I only learned because I was forced to.

Why wouldn’t it work over telnet when it works via SSH?

Serial consoles feed back information one line at a time, so no curses interfaces. No arrow keys, just hjkl. Anything that needs to count characters and columns (like position-based cursor editors like nano) won’t work over telnet.

in my console, or rather terminal

A serial console and a terminal aren’t the same thing.

If you like micro, use micro. I don’t care.

Can you blame them?

Yes. LLMs don’t make anyone not responsible for their output.

If your dumb friend gave you bad advice and you followed it, you are ultimately still responsible for your decisions.

sg_format can restore your disk.

You need to figure out the block layout of the drive and restore a sector map that aligns with the disk.

Start here:

https://forum.level1techs.com/t/how-to-reformat-520-byte-drives-to-512-bytes-usually/133021

And it bears repeating: LLMs do not think, they generate text from statistical output. If the the topic is advanced or uncommon, errors in output are far more likely.

So don’t be tempted to ask chat gpt for further help on this, if that isn’t clear yet.

SAS drive. If you know of a usb-SAS enclosure, I’d like one.

Yes, well CDE doesn’t enter into the equation over a minicom console. As I said, cua isn’t super useful in line-feed environments.

I haven’t seen CDE in over 20yrs.

Emacs is a stranger breed of ppl than vi users still… Kudos.

which I don’t need my three year computer science degree for.

vi really isn’t complex.

CUA editors

CUA editors work as long as there is grid display and ANSI input. They do not work in a line feed or console-line environment like telnet, console, etc., hence the need for hjkl movement.

Also CUA is an IBM initiative, it wasn’t followed everywhere.

When I have to console into the old Solaris boxes at work, I’m reminded both of how many quality-of-life enhancements we enjoy on modern Linux, and also why I will always default to vi as my editor.

I understand the premise, and I’ve seen this come around many times in the last 15 years. I just haven’t seen it named that.

It is a flawed premise. The number of executables and libraries on a system is not a good indicator of its complexity, and complexity is not a good indicator of potential for exploitation.

Xen itself runs on the Linux kernel. In qubes, the root dom0 runs in a Fedora environment, so it is “Linux proper”, but I think I understand what you’re getting at.

Amazing. I’m off to donate to keep your stuff going. Great work.

isn’t quite Linux

What do you mean?

security-by-minimality

That’s a new one.