• 0 Posts
  • 28 Comments
Joined 2 年前
cake
Cake day: 2024年2月16日

help-circle









  • I mean they still advocated for everyone voting in general.

    You can do that if you’re confident you can win. Which is why the gerrymandering apes could do it. But they still did it, because they knew they didn’t have to worry about the election, so they could say the right thing, even if it isn’t what they did. Because advocating for everyone voting you makes you seem confident, and the perception of the people would be “must be an honest man” instead of “oh shit they’re that confident, how have they fixed this system I know to be crooked”.

    Or that’s how I perceived this conversation of you guys.

    Tldr you’re both right essentially








  • This thread is about how people aren’t willing to cover the costs when labour is included.

    Then you comment with “if he had more technical acumen, he wouldn’t need to do [the labour that people are unwilling to pay for]”.

    If he doesn’t know how and doesn’t have the means to do something he shouldn’t be doing it. End of story.

    He does know how. He’s saying he doesn’t have the means, because either he has to spend his time working full time, leaving no time for the labour people are unwilling to pay for, or people pay for the labour they’re unwilling to pay for, giving him the means, in which he will be able to do it, because he already has the knowledge.

    Kinda how if someone gave me a huge plot of land, a quarry, and a billion dollars, I’d have no you’ve building a castle. But since I only know how to build one and don’t have the land, resource or time to labour a few hundred years building a castle bymeself, I’m not able to build a castle, but it’s not because I don’t know how to.

    Maybe some reading comprehension or writing practice would do you good?