The domain https://fediverse.observer/ redirects to sedo now.

On October 11th these two commits where made to the repo:

this will be my final release, glad to have contributed since 2011 to some fediverse stats, https://fedidb.com/ is a great resource with more interest

this software is no longer developed

Sad to have lost such a great resource.

  • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    though with less content advocating for the literal murder of every person currently living inside of a Western civilization).

    “Do you want to see extremist content, including calls for murder?”

    ‘death to america’ is a hyperbolic idiom meaning an end to american imperial dominance, not a wish to harm american people. as an american myself i say it all the time. i want to see an end to the system, not the people living under it. ‘marg bar amrika’ has been a protest chant for 50 years and has been deliberately mistranslated by propagandists to demonize dissent.

    what good is ‘america’ to the people it bombs, imprisons and impoverishes anyway?

    • Vicinus@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      ‘death to america’ is a hyperbolic idiom meaning an end to american imperial dominance …

      To your point, I’ve heard this meaning before, although I don’t think it is commonly known to the general populace (which is also to your other point about propogandization).

      Potentially against your point, if a slogan/idiom is being intentionally misused for misinformation, it might be time to move to a different phrase, rather than sticking with the corrupted one. Additionally, if multiple phrases could be utilized, it may get the point across better (less likely to successfully propagandize multiple options, than a single option). Although, I suspect propagandists would weaponize the ‘weakest’ commonly utilized option against the cause.

      • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I suspect propagandists would weaponize the ‘weakest’ commonly utilized option against the cause.

        one example that comes to mind is the ‘from the river to the sea’ slogan; it’s a call for equal rights across historic palestine, but gets labelled as a call for genocide by detractors.

        changing the slogans doesn’t help because the target isn’t the words, it’s the underlying demand. propagandists will weaponize whatever language you use if the politics behind it threaten them.

        the way i see it conceding the rhetorical terrain just means constantly retreating to increasingly watered down language while the actual demand gets no closer to being heard.