• 2hundredpancakes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    17 days ago

    The other day, someone asserted to me that the definition of anarchism must rest on Plato’s conception of anarchy with no rules or government whatsoever, where everyone is only out for themselves. And that anarchism must necessarily also be an umbrella term which covers not only the aforementioned, but also “shitty takes” like anarcho-capitalism (US libertarianism) as well as the “modern” anarchism we discuss in spaces like this.

    I didn’t really have the wherewithal to address this other than voice my vehement disagreement. It just felt… prescriptive in a very weird way, at best, and at worst, a bad-faith justification to tie the concept of anarchism as we understand it to its most unfortunate “iterations”.

    I’m curious to hear others’ thoughts on this. Is there merit to such an argument? Was I just getting trolled?