Seems that the Swiss legislature may pass a law requiring ProtonVPN to start banning certain domains from being access by French users (mostly illegal sports streaming sites)

For those using ProtonVPN, is the writing on the wall?

  • irmadlad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    22 hours ago

    (mostly illegal sports streaming sites)

    This doesn’t accomplish what the legislature intends. It never does. For instance, in the US, Texas in all their wisdom that can’t keep an electrical grid running smooth without duct tape and bailing wire, has decided to ‘ban’ PornHub. It makes all the christofascist’s dicks hard because in their mind, they have rooted out evil and destroyed it. (See Satanic Panic in the 80s) However, their weak, little minds cannot comprehend the fact that for every technology, there exists an equal, yet undoing technology.

    Do it for the children I hear them say, and I would agree in this example, that children should not be viewing porn. A better solution would be to make parents actually parent. You brought a service into your home that can be both highly detrimental and highly beneficial, and then you turn around give it all, including a cel phone, to a very inquisitive mind uninhibited, unmonitored, and uncontrolled in any manner. You’re the problem, not porn.

    /end soapbox

    • blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      As a very tech savvy parent I have to say that setting up an inhibited, monitored and controlled internet for specific devices and users is insanely difficult. The average person stands no chance. But sure, blame the parents instead of the technology as it is sold and delivered.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      46
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Texas in all their wisdom that can’t keep an electrical grid running smooth

      Works much better than it does in other states. Lived here 30 years and I can count on 1 hand how many times the power has gone out for more than a few minutes.

      • wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I have friends who live in Houston who would like to mention the three times in the last ten years where their power was out for multiple days at a time. Usually while it is freezing or over 100F outside.

      • keepee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        lol what solar powered Texas rock have you been living under? In the last few years, people have DIED because of long lasting power outages in Texas. Back in 2020 I was one of the few lucky ones to not be affected by the snowpocalypse, and had to have friends stay with me for days because their apartment did not have electricity.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Power outage*. You’re referring to a single incident that has since been resolved. Lots of other places have days-long outages multiple times/year.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Works much better than it does in other states

          Might work better for you but there are plenty of other places that are much worse.

      • HybridSarcasm@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Get out of here with that logic and personal experience that contradicts the popular narrative!

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t know if it’s the same law but they’ve already said they’d move countries, anywhere with laws suitable for the service

    • coconut@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Would they really though? Being in Switzerland is a huge part of their brand and marketing.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        The only reason it’s part of their branding because Switzerland is notoriously respectful of privacy. If they stop being that then that’s no longer a selling point.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    Does anyone have thoughts on the IPv6 privacy extensions? They theoretically could help a lot with privacy

    The idea is that your device has tons of temporary IP addresses that can be used for various tasks like surfing the web.

    • Melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      All of your temporary privacy addresses will be coming out of the same subnet, so it’s clear they all belong to the same people.

      Ultimately the privacy extensions are just bringing IPv6’s privacy back in line with IPv4, because without the privacy extensions every single device has a separate IPv6 address based on its MAC address whereas in IPv4 most consumer networks have every device sharing a single IP.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Every single one of those temporary IP addresses has the same prefix, which traces back to you.

      Its about as anonymous as adding an apartment number to your own street address.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That assumes that the prefix is static which it isn’t. It also assumes that you are the only one with that prefix which isn’t necessarily the case. It makes it much harder to track compared to a static IP that is tied to your device.

        If you are the only one using a static prefix then it is less useful but chances are that prefix is shared among lots of users and devices.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yes and no. The deal is your last part is your MAC. So when your extension changes they can still track you over any ipv6 connection. The privacy extension changes the last bit so you can’t be tracked over any connection.

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          the whole point of privacy extensions is that it replaces the MAC with a random something. the address is totally unrelated to the MAC

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      If anything just that it will break most tracking and surveillance systems that weren’t built for the tiny proportion of ipv6 hosts.

      The question is, how can get a few tens of thousands of completely random and unrelated ipv6 addresses and pick one at random for every connection I make to outside my LAN

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They are related but the prefix is shared unless you at some with your own router. (Even then your prefix probably isn’t static)

  • Lucy :3@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just more confirmation that centralized VPNs, and therefore basically all VPNs most people use, are doomed to fail in their purpose, and are sometimes worse than no VPN.

    • gnygnygny@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Many sites got VPN IP list and just ban them. It’s more and more difficult with restrictions increasing subsequently.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        i would say you want to route through as many jurisdictions as you feasibly can. For example, US investigators arent going to get any cooperation from Iran or North Korea; any trail that crosses into their borders is going to be a dead end for their investigation.

        • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I like my Internet to work at at least a decent speed lol I’ll often go through 2 countries when I’m doing specific tasks but generally I just do 1 on a daily basis