cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/41392388

cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/45149956

Ecofascism

https://www.northampton.ac.uk/research-blogs/far-right-and-the-environment-key-themes-of-ecofascism/

https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/448724-investigating-the-role-of-disinformation-in-the-rise-of-eco-fascism

https://gnet-research.org/2025/04/30/ecofascism-and-green-accelerationism-ghosts-of-the-past-or-a-present-danger/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecofascism

https://www.firstnations.org/our-programs/stewarding-native-lands/

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264837722004963

  • RicoBerto@piefed.blahaj.zoneEnglish
    1·
    1 month ago

    But, don’t we already make way more food than even necessary? We just don’t transport it where needed. Instead we grow a shit ton of corn and make it into ethanol for fun and profit.

    Source: I’m on lunch break and can’t be fucked to look again. Though yours isn’t sourced either so I don’t feel bad.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      1·
      1 month ago

      we could also make our food production a gazillion times more efficient if we stopped raising livestock and growing things only to turn them into cattle feed and tractor fuel/corn syrup (granted corn syrup is food, but personally i’d prefer to subsist on the actual raw corn over bottles or syrup)

    • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.netEnglish
      1·
      1 month ago

      Yes. Don’t listen to them. The problem isn’t population. It is distribution. We overproduce for the sake of capitalism to such an extent that we can cut it in half tomorrow and our quality of life would not change in the slightest.

      We have alternatives available. We simply do not use them because those who control the world economies would not be able to make obscene profits from it and it necessitates them giving up their ownership over the means of production in order to facilitate these collectively beneficial alternatives.