• boonhet@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Well there is one problem with negative electricity prices though. It’s that you’re gonna have to pay to produce electricity, charge batteries you might not have, or disconnect from the grid. I suspect fancy new inverters allow doing the latter automatically, but people with older setups will have to either do it manually by the hour when prices go negative, or upgrade their setup.

    Good news is that negative electricity prices also apply to fossil fuels so there’s incentive to reduce production there too.

    • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Here is an idea.

      What if we do something becsuse its a net food, and who cares if there is a positive or negative price because tying everything ever to monitary value is cancer on society.

      • Deme@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        The reason the price goes negative is that there’s too much electricity being produced and not enough being used. The grid isn’t a magical electricity sink. Things will break if the frequency raises too much due to overvoltage. I hate money and capitalism as much as the next guy here, but this dynamic is based on material realities, not market scheming.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Okay but you’re still free to do that. Put up solar panels and PAY for the privilege of producing electricity when there’s not enough demand.

        If you do it on a large enough scale, you can probably bankrupt some coal plants or something.