Fortunately, woodland creatures don’t hire lawyers

  • 211 Posts
  • 72 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2023

help-circle


































  • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOPMtoSoil Science @slrpnk.netTypic Haplocryod
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Pedology definitely has its own language. The USDA version makes my head spin - they smush a bunch of prefixes and suffixes together to make a word. It’s really weird from the outside looking in. The Canadian system is kind of like that but we use full words to describe.

    ex: Gleyed Gray Luvisol - each word means something.

    in the US, they use parts of words to make a new one, which is weird.





  • Stabby, I just wanted to say, I saw your original comment, and was going to side with you - I don’t think it’s feasible to avoid surveillance. I also wanted to say that the way this conversation touches on all the points I thought about ‘drafting’ my comment in my head, so it was really great to read.

    While you can have reasonably dumb sensors (like motion lights in our house, but y’know in a city application), anything beyond that gets really challenging to use without compromising privacy, or becomes a tremendous pain the ass if we give a shit about privacy. Having a bajillion sensors all not talking to each other, or talking to each other through numerous layers creates a data management nightmare. it’s why you don’t get a bunch of technical experts to write several different parts of a report, for instance. You need one main author to go through and make it all sound the same and the parts to speak to each other. Same goes with data. Because of that need, you open yourself up to all that data/surveillance being compromised by 3rd parties or abused by governments, as you point out.