• Sl00k@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I tried moving to Mastadon first a few years ago and it was a pretty shit experience, Bluesky however has stuck in my app rotation pretty well.

    • excral@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      General advice regarding open source: even if you tried something out years ago and didn’t like it, it may be well worth giving it another shot. Open source projects often need some time to mature and take their time to improve, but only get better over time.

      • Sl00k@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Unfortunately until they implement a For you algorithm across all instances and abandoned their archaic hashtag following system I will not be re-attempting

        • bufalo1973@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Do you need someone holding your hand while you cross the street too?

      • moopet@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Which is incidentally the opposite of proprietary products, where if you give it another go in a few years it either doesn’t exist or is enshittified.

    • atro_city@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because Bluesky is centralised. You went from one serial killer’s house to another. You don’t know which serial killer owns your new house, but you’re hoping they’ll be nicer than the previous one. But at least their house is nearly as nice as the old serial killer’s house.

      • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Because Bluesky is centralised.

        You say that like that isn’t exactly what the majority of people want. When I first left Reddit, I was trying to explain Lemmy and federated services to some friends and one of them immediately replied with “why would you want that?” And this was from a guy who owned and operated his own TeamSpeak server just for his friends to use.

        The average person wants a service that’s easy to use first and foremost, and that is always going to be easier to do with a big centralized one owned and operated by a large company. They just want to be able to make an account and connect with friends and content. They don’t care about things like privacy until it actively harms them.

        • atro_city@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I’m not saying it “like” anything. I’m stating that they are not escaping anything but moving from problem to future problem.

          Isn’t email easy to use? Do people know that it’s federated? Probably not, but it’s easy to understand because they have been exposed to it for so long that it’s natural to them without knowing how it works. Why do you assume the same cannot happen for the fediverse? It’s basically social media built on top of email.

          The major mistake people make is trying to explain technical stuff to people who don’t give a fuck. “Look at your email account, it’s YOURNAME@WEBSITE, well, that’s the same for lemmy and mastodon, pick a website you like, create an account, and that’s it”. Everyone knows what a website is, everyone knows what email is, everyone knows (but probably hasn’t realised) that they can send emails to SOMEBODYELSE@OTHERWEBSITE, that’s it.

        • Gigasser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I mean, I don’t even think it’s a matter of privacy, and moreso a matter of spreading out the amount of influence that one person can have as a whole on a public platform. If it’s more spread out, there is less direct control that billionaires and corpos will have on these platforms that have basically become very important in terms of public discourse and public opinion.

      • Gigasser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Dunno why you’re being down voted so hard. Didn’t Bluesky literally cede to Turkish demands of censorship or some shit?