• 1XEVW3Y07@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is great news!

    For those unaware, Google is continuously enacting policies that are closing down the open environment of Android, and I fear this will significantly harm projects like GrapheneOS, CalyxOS, and others.

    If you can spare a couple dollars, please consider throwing some money at PostmarketOS or any other mobile Linux project you like.

  • Pondis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    2 days ago

    The sooner there is a rom compatible with most android devices, the better.

    I’d be off Android so fast.

      • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 days ago

        They already have a Linux app, I can’t see them not making UI adjustments for Linux phones.

        I’m also personally fine just using matrix but thats just me.

        • trevor (he/they)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          The Linux app is just the desktop app, which doesn’t have the functionality that the Android and iOS apps do. It only works when paired with an Android or iOS device, so you’d still be shackled to those ecosystems without proper support for a mobile Linux app.

        • Björn@swg-empire.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          The Signal lead has been vocally against doing a fully fledged version for Linux for a while now. He really likes his closed ecosystems. “for security”

          Desktop Linux is soooo insecure because users can access their own data.

          • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            Ah, good to know. I don’t really use it (just have previously) so didnt know that.

            I’d be curious how that would swing with a heavy number of users switching to a linux phone.

        • black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Wait…signal has a linux-native standalone app that doesn’t depend on android or iPhone? Since when??

          Edit: looks like no

          • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            Agreed, just not the statement I was responding to, which I took as Signal - the company - getting on board with Linux mobile. But maybe I misinterpreted.

          • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Project status: archived

            oof

            i know Flare is another client for Linux, which does adapt itself to window size so it should work on mobile

            tho it can’t be used as a primary device easily (so you’ll need signal on another phone) and from past experience, the linking can be pretty iffy

            • black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              It’s also that any 3rd party apps violate the TOS and if they discover that you’re using it they’ll boot you from the service

            • Qkall@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              …i saw that… curious. #linuxphoneapps had a few options tho… but i, sadly, don’t use signal… so not sure.

        • aaravchen@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          Most of the chips in a smartphone are made by Qualcomm, both processors and peripheral chips like 5G modem, LTE modem, WiFi, and Bluetooth. Qualcomm chips require proprietary binary blobs to function, and usually only have a support lifetime of about 2 years. They also only supply those blobs to the manufacturer of the device.

            • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              Pine64 I think said they’re making the next Pinephone when they can make it RISC-V.

              Which either means they’re enthusiastic about the pace of RISC-V development, or they don’t want to make a new phone anytime soon.

            • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              Qualcomm being what they are is the reason Apple was able to provide a better lifespan for their phones for like a decade (you’d get 5-6 years of iOS major version upgrades compared to 0-2 on Android phones).

              Google actually pushed the Android ecosystem to do better by creating its’ own Tensor SoCs which they support for longer… But they don’t really make the drivers for those open source either. So we’re still not doing better in that regard.

  • glitching@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    rooting for the guys although I don’t want none of them things. I run my device without a modem on (hopefully I disabled it correctly) and I want it to run like my other shit runs - I turn it on when I want it, no doing shit in the background nobody asked it to, syncing to the clown, none of that.

    the results are awesome - I get like days of standby out of a severely degraded battery that can’t manage a whole day under android. still, I understand that other people need this stuff. for me, SMS and calls utilizing the utterly broken, insecure, and definitely compromised telecom infra shouldn’t be a thing in 2025.

  • OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Will there ever be an app ecosystem for Linux phones. I don’t see how could happen. I’m talking actual apps like banking or payment systems. Institutional software such as government apps that requires a stable platform. Not a janky Linux system that is prone to breakage every few updates or scatter across different distros. Seems like the year of the linux desktop meme could end up morphing into the year of the linux phone.

    • Hazematman@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why can’t we just use banking websites? You don’t need an app ecosystem for that. They just need to build a responsive website that will work on a computer or phone. If you have bank to bank transfer (like e-transfer in Canada) that can be done from the mobile website as well.

      Payment like NFC payment is a different story. I suspect its unlikely we ever see that.

      • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Exactly. And as I said in another comment, you can make a wrapper for it if their website is not the most mobile-friendly. Any browser can handle everything beneath the skin.

    • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, they all have standard web interfaces, and so many apps are merely wrappers for it or a rebuilt front-end. On a Linux device one would presume you’ll have a standard web browser so all you need really is a wrapper for the website and the browser engine handles all security. Is there any reason not to just go that route?