because at least on windows, they just don’t work well
shit always opens on the wrong desktop, they’re slow and glitchy. it’s just a pain
I just have four monitors
very infrequently I use virtual desktops for particular things, but too often I need to see the secondary shit while doing the primary and also have a meeting or tertiary info up while accessing chat
I just confirmed that it only disables the animation, controls are still locked for the same period.
Apple time and time again puts feel and looks in front of usability, another example is their magic mouse charging cable placement
I keep forgetting that virtual desktops are a thing that exists.
Why use a virtual desktop when you can simply buy more monitors?
Facts. Or bigger monitors.
because at least on windows, they just don’t work well
shit always opens on the wrong desktop, they’re slow and glitchy. it’s just a pain
I just have four monitors
very infrequently I use virtual desktops for particular things, but too often I need to see the secondary shit while doing the primary and also have a meeting or tertiary info up while accessing chat
Similarly on mac, there’s an animation that it has to finish before releasing controls back to the user. Ubuntu has snappy ones
Settings > Accessibility > Display and then toggling “Reduce Motion” on.
That just disables most if not all animations though, no? The OS should really just be able to handle the inputs during the animation…
I just confirmed that it only disables the animation, controls are still locked for the same period. Apple time and time again puts feel and looks in front of usability, another example is their magic mouse charging cable placement