• Petersson@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Great, now we might get some government attention. But we still have an ace up our sleeve:

    • ook@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      What’s that supposed to mean? All of Lemmy servers are open to the public. Anyone can read all the messages even without any accounts? The decentralised parts mainly prohibit shutting down the whole network easily, taking out one server wouldn’t do much to the rest.

      • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        For me the decentralization means we can always take our party somewhere else if it gets enshittified.

        Invite only instances are probably going to have to become a thing soon. Like how 99% of Reddit doesn’t let you comment with a new account until you look less like spam.

        But at least here you will always be able to join/start a server to host your account.

        • dil@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          if lemmy got popular overnight, wed prob get invite only instances where the requirement is having a lemmy account past a certain age

    • Lena@gregtech.eu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t think surveillance is the issue here (what would they spy on?), more so getting shut down. Which is also virtually impossible due to federation.