Ah ok ty!

it does have something to do with that name, he gets to brand it into the social fabric with his money

since “liberal” as an adjective is used for a wide variety of opposing projects

liberal is a confusing word to begin with and further I dont know if you are calling that to me or to others

go rejuvinate in your obama temple

Why would you hope that as I presume you desire egalitarianism?

I am actually not picking up your nothingnesses, please genuinely explain

Please a least give the grace of understanding that the critique was faced at building funders not grocery purchasers.

Is this projection on your part :D?

Im a student right now, but otherwise, the normal story, what do you imply?

I work towards anarchism, i dont understand

here is berkman with makhno in a bathing suit

yep, private funds mean nothing, there is no moral good in having money and paying things, it is a moral bad because it rallies labour of people who owe you nothing to your own will. All of those so called ( libraries are good but this is the creators personal controlled environment, and it is not good for housing obviously) facilities are shitty ideas of useless people, material in useless shapes, wasted labour and now defended from free usage by a violent state.

Yeah the waste is the labour not the money directly. I think the labour has to be the focus, we can talk about how much the billionaires can do with that money, but its the labour that we need to worry about and its self control.

thats so sad, ive not eaten meat for 6 years or so but i dont know how to handle this evil

I guess people are very familiar with the anti-woke crowd doing the same and are defensive but i agree we should turn down the heat, its hard when they are creating that entropy, but well manage

But success isnt just being popular when it comes to politics, it has always been known that one can make compromises to become more popular, but the compromise then makes the success unworthy.

If it is worthy in its own right then people will always want to trade for it, and the ability will arise without permission, starting off with such begging seems like shooting oneself in the foot.

I saw this but they advertise cooperation with the state which is less liberatory than something like monero.

Why do people want banks to adopt it?

In terms of talking, I think that one can forgo democracy and just take orders, but I also believe that people have a responsibility to not contribute to a labour pool ready to take orders because that leaves the system volatile to capture by a hierarchical current. But I guess you can be smart about where you take orders from and make sure you are taking them from a democratic body. And wishes of a council can be published in easily parsible formats.