• 0 Posts
  • 58 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle



  • So I have both Rackmount Server and Mini PC’s running in my lab, and it really comes down to what do you want/need.

    Mini PC PRO:

    • small size
    • quiet operation
    • low power, low heat
    • limited remote management option with vPro

    Mini PC CON:

    • limited storage options
    • limited ram
    • lower thread/core counts at lower TDP (often 35w)
    • limited expansion or no expansion

    Rackmount Server PRO:

    • offer expansion
    • offer redundant power
    • lots of RAM
    • lots of cores/threads
    • lots of PCIe
    • lots of networking
    • IPMI (remote management)

    Rackmount Server CON:

    • lots of noise
    • lots of heat
    • lots of power use
    • takes up way more space

    https://www.minisforum.com/products/minisforum-ms-a2

    I think the little Minisforum MS series offer the perfect balance of mini PC with server like options. They give you 4 built in network ports 2x 10g and 2x 2.5g which is perfect for most applications IMO, they are available in both AMD and Intel flavors. With the one open PCIe slot you can add an external SAS card and then just use a SAS enclosure for disks. I currently have USB HD’s plugged into my mini PCs and its not great, they dont get enough cooling, and I live in fear because they are on cheap wallwart power supplies. It is working and for the most part has been.

    My Rack configuration has been stripped down massively and now its just a single 2RU and Dell 1RU that is a low spec storage server only. The 2RU has an AMD 3900x w/ 64gb and 16gb MI25 card so I can tinker with AI, the Dell is just an i3-8gen with 32g and 4x 12tb drives.

    The Lenovo’s are both i5-8gen with 32gb, same with the Dell mini PC, the Minisforum is an MS-A1 before they had the MS-A2 with better networking and PCIe. The Lenovo’s do have upgraded networking so I can have 4 network ports per box, 2x 10gb, 1x 2.5, 1x1g.













  • Hey, sorry for the delay, I am glad to hear that @curbstickle@anarchist.nexus had Wireless Workbench running on wine because Proprietary software like that will be the biggest hangup.

    For Qlab, how are you using it?

    As for limitations, the biggest one will be stuff that is “industry standard” but was only ever developed for Mac & windows. Most stuff should run fine under wine or have an OSS/FOSS alternative worth using but specific tools that are by the MFG could be a problem.

    https://flathub.org/en/apps/org.linuxshowplayer.LinuxShowPlayer Linux Show Player may be a good option to replace Qlab, but I have not used it personally.

    If these systems are going to be deployed and used by other techs its not a bad idea to look at an immutable distro like Bazzite might be a good fit.

    https://bazzite.gg/

    One aspect of Linux that is different from windows is you get to select your desktop environment, IE window, menu, default applications, ect. The two big ones are KDE (a highly customizable windows like interface) and Gnome ( a more Mac like interface but still customizable). There are dozens of other window managers but I would focus on those two since they will be good starting points.