

They can get away with anything because most industries demand Siemens.
On a sidenote what would you or your father say a good brand PLC is?


They can get away with anything because most industries demand Siemens.
On a sidenote what would you or your father say a good brand PLC is?
LLM’s found a mountain of security exploits of different magnitudes in the Linux kernel which got patched.
You’re in luck it already is https://x.com/NathanFlurry/status/2105874931586310248
This is about banning AI contributions from specific open-sourced projects.
Do you even know what Codeberg did?
If the goal isn’t to oppose the technology but instead steer towards better use of the technology then that should be promoted. This blanket opposition means that we get fascists like DHH being the only ones to adopt LLM’s because for some reason the left has a hate boner for it.
LLM’s can save tremendous time now. You see projects like C&C Generals running on a tablet, or Lego Racers on web which would require tonnes of manual labour and now they’re just a few LLM prompts. It’s gotten to the point these kind of projects which would have been multi-year undertakings in the past have become “unimpressive”
Yes they’re not perfect and they do make mistakes. That’s why understanding architecture is more important than ever. But manual coding is really becoming a thing of the past. Agentic coding progress over the last year has pretty much solidified that. It’s still not perfect but it’s really good now.
Any industry that throws billions of dollars into something will make progress and now that progress has been made there’s not much of a point in just resisting the tech itself. Therefore instead of pleading against all AI I believe it’s much better to plead for open weight or open source and efficient AI.
The problem is like with the Luddites that you don’t own the machine (AI) and the largest companies want to keep full control over them. It’s a problem with the system ruling you not with the technology itself.
This is the exact opposite. Trying to ban AI from everything despite its use cases.
Many people don’t know this but even Luddites didn’t oppose machinery. They simply opposed the ownership structure of it. So instead of saying “no LLM” you could say “Open-source/weight LLM’s allowed only”.
Issues of licensing and stolen code, potentially causing copyright problems which most open-source projects are poorly fit to resolve and may go down because of them
What, we care about licenses and copyright now?
Big tech has stolen all code and now everything it “open source”. You’re not going to get into legal trouble for using LLM generated code there’s no precedent for that. The only ones getting sued are the big tech companies who stole the code.
Environmental impact of model training, huge data centers threatening water supplies, producing tons of e-waste, creating noise pollution, increasing power demand, including one from unclean sources at the critical point when we should reduce it as much as possible
Sure but that’s mostly them training a gazillion new models. You could ban models from providers that are doing all these things and thus promote more efficient models.
Deterioration in skill level of human coders and lack of avenues for juniors to learn to code properly, which is likely to stay as an essential thing to have
Valid but understanding architecture and delegating writing the code and especially tests is becoming much more important than just artisan writing it these days.
Outside coding, there are many ethical issues around companies producing LLM models, as many have ties to the military and police, and are heavily misused to fuel fascist regimes
Like I said there’s local models as well. China puts out plenty of great open weight stuff like GLM5.3 which will likely have to run in the cloud but it’s still open weight.
Can the blind anti LLM jerk stop already it’s the same 2024 2025 arguments. Agentic coding has massively improved this year even local open source LLM’s are getting good


Besides slop coding, by far the most useful use case for AI is writing tests to find unintended bugs. It should 100% be used if not just for that.
Great call. I’m not sure if they should focus so heavily on the recycling theme. In the end, the goal is a superior Linux operating system for all phones, not just recyclable hardware. But the logo still looks pretty sleek.


I’s like to see a non Omarchy AI focussed Linux distro but transforming KDE into it seems like a bad idea.


Multiple Debian based distros. You do an update, reboot, and your screen is black untill you press alt + f2 and then login and sudo apt install [desktop-environment]


On Linux it’s usually just your desktop environment that gets wiped somehow. But if you know how to fix it, then it’s alright. Very annoying though.


A distro in just 300 hours? is it artisan coded or sloppadoppadoo?


IBM Granite Speech 4.1 or Cohere Transcribe according to current benchmarks.
IBN Granite Speech 5 appears to be a great fast option as well for fast transcription but it’s English only. Parakeet Unified is a good fast modern option with multi language.


You can also just click the repository and see that Claude is a contributor which usually gives it away.
My point is more so that OP didn’t even put in the effort to ask claude to look up the current best ASR model to use but instead one-shotted the thing


No but other models have. parakeet-unified is currently the best small model.
You can tell OP vibe coded the whole thing from their outdated model choice.
Great to see Rockchip becoming more and more stable. Raspberry Pi has fully sold out to corporate people need to start moving away from it as fast as possible.
Here’s to hoping a RiscV support starts becoming more mature soon too