

At present, most probably only those that appear on the regulatory radar in their own right.
Hi! 👋 I’m Gerrit and in love with the Internet since 1994. 💞 Media ▹ Communication 👨🔬 Entrepreneur & Consultant at eicker® [iCare] ⏻ Reinschauen: eicker.TV 📲 Get in touch! 📇🇩🇪🇬🇧 #Fedizen #AI #Tech #Media #Sovereignty


At present, most probably only those that appear on the regulatory radar in their own right.


Probably. Regulators usually care about reach, not architecture. If the Fediverse became genuinely mainstream, it would likely end up in the same political spotlight. The real difference is that federation makes compliance an instance by instance problem, not one global switch. That is much harder to enforce.


There probably is no magic solution: I would focus on making abuse expensive instead of making honest users miserable. Gradual trust, optional vouching, sensible rate limits, reputation, and behavioral signals together will outperform almost any CAPTCHA while keeping the door open for real newcomers.


This! It’s fast. It’s reliable. Love it!
The harsh truth: most people don’t care about decentralisation, protocols or who owns the server. They care whether their friends, memes and creators are there. Don’t sell them the Fediverse as digital vegetables.
Find them a great app, help them follow 20 interesting accounts, and make it fun. Network effects beat ideology every time.
I’d start with Loops.video: TikTok already proved that vertical short videos are basically social media crack, so don’t ask your friends to suddenly become Mastodon power users reading federation essays.
Give them a familiar format without the TikTok ecosystem: Fediverse adoption probably needs to feel boringly familiar before anyone cares that it’s decentralised.
That reminds me that I really must finally mention this on: Fedizen.EU