• 0 Posts
  • 11 Comments
Joined 7 days ago
cake
Cake day: August 15th, 2025

help-circle
  • Great points about learning, but I’m just explaining what my original comment was about: daily experience of using a distro and reliability.

    For me arch installation was the most educational Linux experience since after 10+ years of using Linux, that was the first time I clearly understood each part of the system. But tbh that knowledge has so far been mostly academic - knowledge for the sake of knowledge.

    All this comparing and inter-distro warring seems pointless.

    It’s got a point when every thread has people recommending arch, even when it’s not relevant in any way. We’re talking about arch in a thread about a nixos guide after all.




  • I’m talking about day to day usage. Arch installation is a good learning experience, but running it for me was more trouble than it’s worth.

    The worst issue I’ve had so far with nix is an update failing before it’s applied because of some package. Meanwhile arch would regularly update, and then fail to boot or break something.

    I gave up on arch after a few years when I had to literally weigh whether -S or -Syu would be more likely to mess up my system while I was working abroad.


  • bobo@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlIntroduction to Nix & NixOS
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Got a lot of use for DE and other gui related modules in that usecase? Are you spinning up KDE to build a container? Did you write to the devs that they remove the installation wizard for desktop use? Did they accidentally add all of the non-reproducible imperative commands to nix?

    Get over yourself. It’s a great distro for desktop use, and I seriously don’t get why you’re foaming at the mouth because people are using it differently than you…