It would have been funnier to say that you didn’t know where it is. 🤪
OpenStars
Compassion ~ Thought
- 1 Post
- 294 Comments
OpenStars@piefed.socialto
Fediverse@piefed.social•So, is it getting quieter here in the #Fediverse; is it even dying?English
11·7 days agoI dunno, look at all that the Musk does to X (or better yet, don’t) but then people remain stuck on that platform, held hostage by the network effect or whatever other reason. Enshittification has progressed far enough that Lemmy is not well regarded on Reddit, a fact enhanced by posts talking about it being removed. People may be cutting back on Reddit, but they do not seem to be bringing those discussions here. Perhaps people are discoursing more IRL rather than social media.
…“clean”? Well shit, I have some work to do then!:-P
OpenStars@piefed.socialto
Technology@lemmy.zip•Reddit’s CEO says r/popular sucks, and it’s going away, also Reddit is limiting the amount of popular subreddits a person can moderateEnglish
2·16 days agothe most human place on the internet.
Yes… “human”, that’s right these are the most human humans that ever humaned their way to humanness, r-r-right!?
(Except for the bots ofc)
Only $9.95 for the first hour, then $39.99 thereafter.
The Tom Hanks one was really good.
OpenStars@piefed.socialto
Technology@lemmy.zip•[Opinion] AI finds errors in 90% of Wikipedia's best articlesEnglish
21·18 days agoUsing ChatGPT to “fix” Wikipedia, what could possibly go wrong? (/s as the approach seems valid, this is just a funny statement)
I think there’s a way to make that happen. Sorry I don’t use apps, I just played around with it in the past, but I recall not liking it until someone told me how to make the images larger - buried VERY deep in the customizations somewhere - and then afterwards it became my favorite app (except I don’t actually use apps, but IF I did, it would be Voyager. Or Thunder. And with full sized images that don’t cut parts out.)
OpenStars@piefed.socialto
Fediverse@piefed.social•Graph showing the centralization of the Mastodon platform on Mastodon.socialEnglish
6·28 days agoSo obviously the devs are going to start listening to users and make following accounts and searching for content across instances easier and more streamlined… r-r-right?! RiGhT???
There is a reason that things happen. Oh well, hopefully they pull their heads out of their asses before Bluesky pisses off its user base and they miss yet another major migration wave.

I also left Reddit not for the tankies but for kbin.social, so PieFed is a spiritual successor for that:-).
I feel so seen, so… so… touched (by so very many processes).
Of course not, that would require effort! 😉

In terms of number of users, rate of growth (in number of users, communities, instances, etc.), level of app support, appreciation from the Threadiverse community, and by all other metrics, yeah? Especially the sheer pace of development of PieFed, which is just a pleasure to observe such a labor of love.
Threaded conversations in Mbin appear more like an afterthought to the Twitter/X microblogging style - see e.g. its own level of app support. Also, the peak of Mbin (according to this site was 874 monthly active users in April 2024, but just one month later that had dropped to 563 and today is 719.
Though Mbin is still remembered - now as the Threadiverse = Lemmy + PieFed + Mbin (+ nodeBB + flarum, with Sublinks seemingly abandoned). There is room for us all here! :-) I will add that if Mbin ever wanted to actually get serious, it would be nice to see.
OpenStars@piefed.socialto
Technology@lemmy.zip•New data shows companies are rehiring former employees as AI falls short of expectationsEnglish
10·1 month ago… at the same or higher salary, r-r-right?
No!
…yes, maybe? Ngl that toast does smell good right now…
OpenStars@piefed.socialto
Technology@lemmy.zip•Bluesky experiments with dislikes and 'social proximity' to improve conversationsEnglish
1·2 months ago“disliking” a post isn’t going to do anything
Not true - it seems designed to increase advertising revenue for the CEO:-P. That’s… “something”, technically? 🤪
OpenStars@piefed.socialto
Technology@lemmy.zip•Bluesky experiments with dislikes and 'social proximity' to improve conversationsEnglish
32·2 months agoThey are focusing on enshittification
It is what they want - for them it is a “feature” to exist surely inside of their echo chambers. MANY Lemmy instances - hexbear.net and Lemmy.ml to name just a couple - are the same, banning people who even remotely disagree with them.
Profit-seeking is not the only cause of enshittification.
OpenStars@piefed.socialto
Technology@lemmy.zip•Bluesky experiments with dislikes and 'social proximity' to improve conversationsEnglish
11·2 months agoI like the way that PieFed implements this.
-
“Highly contentious users” i.e. those who are consistently heavily downvoted by “trusted instances” (I don’t know the actual thresholds but imagine someone who receives 10x more downvotes than upvotes - and e.g. hexbear.net can be federated with but not “trusted” so that downvote brigading can be eliminated, unless ofc they use their non-HB alts but while nothing is perfect, every ounce of protection does help:-) are labeled, but there is currently no way that I am aware of to actually remove their content. Still, it helps to see that automatically-applied label as you scroll down, so that you can skip past it or at least realize that a reply is going to fall on deaf ears. People’s reputations precede us irl so why not online as well, where it is so much easier to measure?
-
Individual content - posts and comments - that are highly contentious, according to user-defined thresholds, can be either automatically collapsed or even hidden. I personally disable both of these, but if someone wants to not see highly contentious content then this makes it happen for them. Similarly there are keyword filters - again nothing will ever be perfect but if you want to see less of e.g. Musk or Trump, then this is a method to help reduce the incoming flood of content related to such.
-
Communities have access to “community-specific” voting patterns. I know less about this aspect but generally the entire community or perhaps an individual post could be limited to community-specific rules, like a member can vote but a non-member drive-by commentor might be disallowed under certain conditions. Not every community should be this way and I hope most won’t enable these features, but they are necessary sometimes - e.g. a community for and by women needs to exclude all the “don’t you know that I am such a nice man”-splaining that will inevitably arise.
Anyway I love the hierarchy that distributes the work of moderation all the way from instance admins (for e.g. illegal content) through community mods (who have access to software to help them) and ultimately powers the end-users to control their own recipient of content, which they can change over time - e.g. rather than leave social media entirely they could enable some of the contentious user and/or keyword filter controls and thereby attain for themselves a break from the noise and hubub that the entire internet tends to prefer to throw at us all the time.
In contrast, whatever little moderation that Bluesky has is obviously insufficient - the problems of outright monotonization spam and high contentious users seems to have overwhelmed whatever capacity there was to handle such.
PieFed has really high me hope for the entire Fediverse.
-
OpenStars@piefed.socialto
Technology@lemmy.zip•Bluesky experiments with dislikes and 'social proximity' to improve conversationsEnglish
3·2 months agoModeration seems sorely lacking on Bluesky. And did you read the comment in the OP article? It offered “I am such a nice man” vibes, though technically not entirely wrong either, yet failing to consider replies not offered in good faith nor the consent of the recipient to receive such shocks to their systems.



type -a