

Terrorism is the use of violence and fear to bring about political or social change. Fighting back against the bad guys is not necessarily terrorism.
Do you support random bombings and shootings in order to frighten people into behaving the way you want them to? Or do you support defending yourself and fighting against those who would strip your freedoms from you and your loved ones? Those are two very different things and only one of them is terrorism.


I am honestly not sure I can call the killing of that CEO an act of terrorism. That man was responsible for many deaths and the suffering of untold numbers of people. For his killing to be terrorism, in my opinion, he would have to be an innocent victim. And I think I would honestly consider him an active enemy and his killing an act of self defense or at least retribution.
Would you support the execution of insurance company office workers? That would be an indisputable an act of terrorism. But punishing, up to and perhaps including killing, the leaders of companies who are actively killing innocent people for profit? That is not necessarily terrorism. I might consider it self defense but I’d have to think about it more.