
Took 'em long enough…

Took 'em long enough…

physical reinforcement is a good suggestion lots are coming up with. If it’s not too late, I’d recommend doing that with something that dissolves the ABS instead of an adhesive. ABS dissolves readily with a few solvents, like acetone. Get physical reinforcement in place, and IF you do not need any bulk filler, just use a solvent like acetone to literally melt and repolymerize the plastic back together. As long as there’s no new gaps or new voids, the physical reinforcement should leave it stronger than the original. At least after all the solvent evaporates away.
If you need gap filler or bulk reinforcement, two part epoxies are definitely the way to go, though make sure to use something quite flexible or it’ll just crack off the next time you drop them.

Too bad most humans are pathetic worms living in what ever satisfies them instead of what makes the world better… sounds more like a fragile piece of shit problem than a problem of me…

Fuck you for being so unable to face reality. You truly are the fucking worst of humanity,

and what about that is factually correct in, “boost Steam Deck frame rates by up to 32%”?
If you say, “butbutbut they said ‘up to’!” … then you’re nothing but an absolute moron drooling over press releases thinking about what they mean less than an average cave man thinks how to cook their dinner…

lol no. Absolutely no. In any way. Ever. A bug either works or it doesn’t. The fact you think I’m talking about something else means you are already cooked, utterly and completely. Sad.

Could boost 1% framerates by 30%+… way to fucking fail miserably at your ONE job…

Except a good programmer will have proof, in the form of at minimum manual tests that exercise the exact issue. A good programmer will have automated tests that clearly assert the behavior in question.
It genuinely boggles my mind when people whine about having to prove what the AI said… THEY SHOULD’VE BEEN DOING THAT THE WHOLE FUCKING TIME in their entire career!

I dunno’, kinda’ sounds like bigotry training for dogs, IMO!
… /s, ish

Honestly no idea. I just found it by seeing that it was near the top of the recommended distro lists on … some distro list website, and decided to give it a shot after reading the description.
What bought me over was that it’s supposed to be just a solid distro based entirely on Debian Stable that happens to include a good few “MX Linux” tools, like the delivered nvidia driver install script, or the backup ISO creation, and whatnot.
Unless I’m misunderstanding something, it’s supposed to be basically just Debian Stable with extras for convenience, and unless I’m misunderstanding/experiencing Debian, they’ve done a decent job. It’s beating the shit out of Manjaro and Ubuntu, but those aren’t exactly high bars, IMO.

I’ve been having good luck with MX Linux. It’s based on Debian Stable, and mostly just has some extra nice tools ontop of Debian Stable and that’s it. The only problems I’ve been having have been minor, and I think more general KDE+Wayland with HDR and VRR bugs you’d probably hit on most distros.
rofl AI is absolutely not capable of stochastic reasoning, either… Yes, ‘stochastic’ implies reasoning as well. They DO NOT REASON, PERIOD.
“AI” does not reason, so you were on a goose chase anyways.
Neutral capitalist … lol

Some manufacturers made all sorts of different codes for instructions between various models of tv and remote. That includes some different TVs only sharing an ‘on’ or ‘off’ code and not the other.
It’s why many ‘universal’ remotes will tell you in the instructions to keep trying different numbers for the manufacturer until all features work. So… you’ll have to do that. Try all Toshiba TV codes that remote knows. If none of them support all features, hopefully you can tweak button by button!

Neither will adding Big Brother to your print pipeline.

Cover them and see who complains first.

lol I’ve understood the issue. The original post is not exactly nuanced. I’m sorry you feel so offended by my opinion that people who do not understand what a community of questions and answers should look like should not be welcome to people who understand what publicly answered questions should look like, but you do you.

Who is downvoting a post based on what’s not in the post title or body? Besides, there are far more downvotes now than when I made my original comment, so it’s clearly not people being fooled by previous, now removed comments.
Also, I said or. It’s Either they’re against a community of answering questions openly, or have the reading comprehension of a potato…
The headphones I currently use (on my head right now) also have physical reinforcement, but instead of zip ties it’s just a thin tensile wire I had lying around. Tied it around a cylinder piece that broke off that holds a rotatable insert, superglue, and lots of extra wraps encased in superglue… and it’s perfect! … outside of where I was dumb and got glue between the rotatable faces and now it binds up a bit, but otherwise great. Replacement parts would’ve been like $35+.
… I guess all of that is to say, physical reinforcement is excellent when it’s adding strength as opposed to replacing strength! (similar to OP, the superglue is a bit brittle for a one to one toughness fix).