Joined the Mayqueeze.

  • 0 Posts
  • 34 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle



  • There are laws and case law that make criticism of Israel harder than in other places. Post WW2 pro-Nazi and antisemetic speech was basically declared hate speech. Courts have taken a narrow view of what counts as antisemetic. There are in excess of six million reasons for that hard swing in the other direction.

    So I would say the long version is this: you can criticize Israel but you need to pay close attention to how you say it. Criticizing the existence of the Jewish state is possible as well but you need to weigh your words even more carefully.

    Moderators on an internet forum may take an even narrower approach to avoid any sort of legal trouble. And thus continues a chilling effect.

    Freedom of speech is a tricky subject. Post WW2 the US had the influence to export their constitutional values, such as a first amendment, to Japan and West Germany. In both cases they punted. It’s not without some irony when I say opinions on how to establish freedom of speech in a democratic constitution vary.



  • Your account is five days old. So I don’t think your message here carries a lot of weight unfortunately. That post is violating the community rules as well. And the account defended itself to not be a bot when no one accused it of that. So it’s probably not a great case to use to start a warm welcome campaign.

    Former redditors should be familiar with something like forum rules and how to check them.











  • I try to add ALT to every image I post. It slows me down. Writing a good description takes time, often more time than the post alongside. I don’t think many people don’t take the time to write it because they hate visually impaired users. They are short of time more often than not wanting to be inclusive. A sort of engagement punishment filter will not fix that. And I wonder if the blind community would want to be excluded from all posts without ALT because it would also rob them of the opportunity to learn about the content from the context of the replies. Or the chance to have it described to them by somebody in their vicinity.

    The problem isn’t just adding a description to a picture; it’s also the quality of that description. I fear adding a filter like that will lead to more bad ALTs (dummy texts, AI crap, copy and paste of the post, etc.).

    My guess is the militant no ALT, no engagement folks are all well enough sighted. Their energy would be better used to add descriptions to the discourse rather than calling out the users who forgot or didn’t have time (and sure, it would include the small group of trolling assholes who don’t do it on purpose). Add a hashtag #ALT and a good description into the replies. Code the client to look for replies with that hashtag when ALT is missing.

    So I think the reverse filter will be more beneficial. Filter all posts without ALT so people can add the missing descriptions.


  • I fear there won’t be a solution that doesn’t cost money somewhere. Please don’t buy 3 burner phone numbers at once. I would feel bad if it didn’t work and/or you get suspected of being a criminal.

    Check your current phone subscription if you have one. There might be a way to get an additional number for free or very little extra. And it might be a good backup emergency service to have just with your parents maybe even if you go down a different route for the rest.


  • Anything other than Signal seems unadvisable from a privacy POV. Do you have a way of talking to them live on the phone, at the same time? You can try and register their Signal on a burner phone wherever you are. As they sign up, you sit on the call and give them the phone number and security code when it comes through. Unless having Signal on the phone is itself a reason to get arrested in Russia, which frankly wouldn’t surprise me either.

    I don’t know if this will work. I did it on a different service using the number on a dumbphone to register for use on a tablet once.


  • Is there something wrong with making a new account to make a discussion post about a video?

    If the video is from a platform whose algorithm thrives on controversy, is presented in a context of controversy, on a new account, it’s at least suspicious here on the lemmyverse.

    So you’ve been thinking about joining the fediverse but it was this video you wanted to share with us that finally made you pull the trigger? It’s a sequence of events I find inherently sus.

    Is this not a forum website?

    Yes, it is. And as such it is sometimes abused by people with ulterior motives.

    This is ridiculous behavior.

    That is both your prerogative to think so and a matter of opinion.

    I’ve been respectful and open to every single person I’ve responded to. I am not creating drama or name calling.

    Your eagerness to engage virtually any comment on this niche subject is what I find suspicious. It’s the eagerness you also see by people who abuse Lemmy for rage bait.

    If there’s drama being created on this post, it’s because people can’t stand Mutahar. And I agree with them! But as someone who refuses to be an ideologue living in an echo chamber, I watch content from sources I don’t agree with too, and I discuss it. I don’t get what problem you have with this.

    I don’t know who that is and don’t care enough to find out. I refer you to my criticism of the source of the video. My suspicion, which I have to say your comments have not diminished, is that you created this account and this persona to generate more views to feed the algorithm on YouTube and not because you wanted to have a serious discussion about the subject.