

More like “If it isn’t as good as it could be, don’t do anything to improve it.”
More like “If it isn’t as good as it could be, don’t do anything to improve it.”
Wow you can tell from the first paragraph that this isn’t worth reading. I read it… just out of curiousity…
For some reason the whole discussion around this Rust/C/Linux/GNU/thing is mostly focused around superficial and irrelevant things like the sexualities and genders of the Rust people
Err…
Rust people seem to be focused mostly on identity politics and dividing people into groups that are then supposed to fight each other. As I wrote earlier, I didn’t invent the term “Rust people” myself - those people themselves identify as “Rust people”, which is not a good thing. I code mostly in C and assembly, but I certainly don’t identify as a “C person”. I can also write other programming languages, and I would even learn Rust if it wasn’t such a horrible Trojan horse that is clearly designed to destroy computing freedom.
… yeah. I can confirm he has zero sane points. Let’s not give this lunatic any credence.
It makes sense (RVA23 is probably the first profile that is actually competitive for desktop use), but also is there a single real RVA23 chip available yet? Might be a little premature…