• 0 Posts
  • 90 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle
  • I’ve seen this one a few times and it’s puzzled me a bit for a while now, I don’t think anyone in these companies think iterating on an LLM model alone is going to give them AGI

    You only have to look at how Claude Code has taken off in the past 6 months. Sure the model is a big factor, but it’s the tooling built on top of it that makes it useful and disruptive. The model is what enabled the utility, when attached to conventionally engineered tooling.

    Whenever the first AGI is created, an LLM will 100% be part of the implementation, it’s just more than a one piece puzzle


  • HDHomerun is the commercial solution that is relatively painless assuming you have something that can run a client that supports it

    Open source, you probably want to look at tvheadend and a USB DVB-T tuner (hauppauge still make decent ones I believe) attached as the next most straightforward option, it can take a little bit to get set up but it’s pretty seamless once it is. Same caveat about clients




  • I’m not sure I understand where you’re coming from, let me just clear up where I’m coming from in case I’m confusing things:

    Obviously most users won’t have a laptop that can draw 240W

    Though additionally, laptops that are able to draw 240W do exist today (there’s even some that come with 360W barrel jack chargers now IIRC). Yes, they’re for enthusiasts or professionals, but they still exist, so unless the spec prevented it*, they should be included in consideration too IMO

    Given this is legislation that applies with a pretty broad stroke, I was making the point it’s kinda arbitrary to stop applying it at 100W.

    *Another commenter made the very good point though, that the 240W standard is simply too new to be part of this legislation. So kinda satisfied with that answer
















  • Most people […] write […] comments […] and hope AI picks them up

    Really quite sad if there’s even one person out there doing that.

    This is also as much of a grift as any SEO that claims to have cracked the code of getting to the top of results. Even if they have figured something reproducible, it will get fixed. If someone can manipulate a search engine to provide results different to what it would otherwise do, that’s a bug they will fix