• Ghoelian@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Well this is why you have different levels of warnings. Some are just flat out errors, some are strong warnings, others are weak warnings. Of course, at the end, the programmer has to be the one to decide to follow the language server’s diagnostics or not.

    As far as I understand, the whole draw of Rust is it’s very opinionated in its safety. If you don’t want that, Rust is just not for you.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      47 minutes ago

      Rust is it’s very opinionated in its safety. If you don’t want that, Rust is just not for you.

      Yeah, for hand coding my own things, I find Rust offensive and needlessly rigid leading to unnecessary complexity - complexity being the mother of all bugs.

      For code written by our overseas contingent, and / or LLMs, Rust is at least a little comforting, and if anyone ever starts maintaining the code I have written (rare, so far, but increasing ever so slowly), I suppose having the maintenance done in Rust isn’t a bad thing either.