• Croquette@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Wether you plan to live there or not in 30 years is irrelevant to the situation.

    Your tenant pay over half the mortgage. So you get a subsidized housing, keep the appreciated value of the duplex as well and all that for the basic maintenance of the property?

    Golly, what a deal.

    • StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      I think they’re not considering how the portion of rent that only goes toward the mortgage is still profit despite it not being accessible until the home is sold or a loan taken against its equity.

    • too_high_for_this@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s absolutely relevant if you know how a mortgage works. Payments are ~75% interest in the first decade. I’m not going to have enough equity at that time to make a profit after all the money I put into the house. I’m looking at a $50k loss if the market stays steady. Still cheaper than renting, though.

      Yes, my tenant subsidizes my living costs. That’s the point of a duplex. I set the rent at what I thought was fair, given my expected losses and the work I put in.

      There’s no shortage of housing here. If my tenant wanted to, he could buy a house right now. He’s waiting until he retires, specifically because he doesn’t want the responsibilities of home ownership while he’s still working.