A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 22 days agoWell...lemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square24linkfedilinkarrow-up1112arrow-down114
arrow-up198arrow-down1imageWell...lemmy.dbzer0.comA404@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 22 days agomessage-square24linkfedilink
minus-squarelurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down9·21 days agorights imply laws. laws aren’t anarchist.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down2·21 days agoYou should probably understand the concept behind human rights before you talk about either anarchism or liberalism, both of which accept the idea.
minus-squaretoo_high_for_this@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·21 days agoNo rulers is not the same as no rules.
minus-squaregurty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·21 days agoThat implies that you can’t have any rights unless the government says you can have them.
rights imply laws. laws aren’t anarchist.
You should probably understand the concept behind human rights before you talk about either anarchism or liberalism, both of which accept the idea.
No rulers is not the same as no rules.
That implies that you can’t have any rights unless the government says you can have them.