It was NOT found to be untrue. Full stop.

It was found to be unsubstantiated. If you have experience with these types of investigations, that’s the most common outcome.

In order to substantiate it, there must be evidence multiple years after the fact.

Considering the poor data retention LTT has to it’s critical data, I seriously doubt their email/IM archives are much better. People forget, leave the company, etc.

They don’t interview former employees, except the subject/person who made the allegations.

These firms aren’t going to find evidence the majority of their investigations.

Considering the person who supposedly conducted th sexual harassment follows alt right manosphere people AND made a sexual joke during the sexual harassment meeting they had (I wonder why an employee recorded this meeting?) I’d consider the person who made the allegations is most likely to be truthful.

If you look at prosecution data of sexual assault, rape, etc you’ll see that the vast majority of cases go unprosecuted due to lack of evidence.

While this is slightly different, it is an interpersonal issue and hard records are unlikely