• testfactor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    To clarify, the article is just saying that it’s wildly unfeasible and prohibitively expensive.

    They’re not saying it’s dangerous or going to harm people in some way.

    I feel like some people may get the wrong idea from the headline.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s absolutely harmful to waste resources on worthless grifting at the expense of the planet and people suffering from very real deprivation.

      That’s part of why it’s the same people promoting both the grift and the deprivation.

    • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      You mean they didn’t mention that the laws of physics make data transfer to and from orbit an absolute PitA and that no one would sit around for that long?