• Qwel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Prettier but has a track record of having more technical issues. Also the devs are a company with absolutely no transparency. At some point there was so few communication that I thought they closed shop.

      If you want a similar UI, I would advise going for a vanilla Gnome and adding the desired “Zorin *” extensions. It’s a bunch more work to setup but it feels more trustworthy to me.

    • Artaca@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      19 hours ago

      More glitz and glam than many other distros I’ve tried. It was the first one I tried when trying to leave Windows. Eventually did Mint, Pop, Nobara, and Garuda. Chose Mint to stick with for now and haven’t regretted it.

      If one of my less savvy friends asked about switching to Linux, I would mention Zorin as a possible option simply because it goes out of its way to feel familiar.

      • pressedhams@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Thanks! I got the feeling that it was trying to feel like windows to ease the pain of transition. I’ve just seen several hype posts for it recently and wondered what was up.

        • Damage@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 minutes ago

          I don’t really get this “it has to be similar to Windows” approach. It’s gonna be different, the more you try to imitate windows, the more frustrating it will be when you get to things that HAVE to be different.

    • yessikg@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Uses Gnome instead of Cinnamon, has a paid version, that’s all the differences I can think of