Let’s dive right into the debate on the origins of money, the reality of pre-money exchange, the actual uses of barter through history, and how all of this h...
Communism doesn’t have to have to be top-down. I honestly don’t believe that it ever can be, and that people who try to do things that way are either naive and doomed to failure or liars doing a great job manipulating everyone.
I think the key difference is that good behavior was facilitated and enforced by personal relationships. It’s not clear how this social arrangement could exist at larger scales.
Well I think it’s communism
Sees bottom up, emergent organization.
Communism doesn’t have to have to be top-down. I honestly don’t believe that it ever can be, and that people who try to do things that way are either naive and doomed to failure or liars doing a great job manipulating everyone.
20th century Marxism polluted the word Communism. even Marx said he would not call himself a Marxist.
The administration of things is still a state no matter how much they wish it wasn’t.
I think the key difference is that good behavior was facilitated and enforced by personal relationships. It’s not clear how this social arrangement could exist at larger scales.
At had a few things that look similar, but it was nothing like what Marx imagined.
Marx isn’t the only communist philosopher