I’m designing a self-governance system for these guys that might generally be useful for any kind of large-scale self-organized societies.

Before you ask, yes, this is crypto bullshit, but as I think about it (and the customer team that asked me to do this holds this opinion as well), crypto tokens are not supposed to be some capital. They are just computational infrastructure usage quota really, their scarcity is totally artificial and made into money just because capitalism. The idea here is to make a system where any community might be able to deploy a private network (and keep minting enough usage tokens for everyone while protecting the net from malware attacking community members electronics or brains), and use it in self-organization. And I’m mostly using capitalist vocabulary for obvious reasons.

So in short, the concept here is, first, to separate the community into some kind of small “core” (elders, technical experts, ecologists, immediate activist organization core, or nobody - why not? One chamber is fine too, but sometimes you just need more; maybe you are gently ramping up from little power to no power?) and large “everyone else”, and then rotate a small random group of “general public” for their community decisions duty.

Please let me know what you think.

It’s not like this is really new concept, but I’m going to implement it as a working self-governance tool in a particular way I’ve outlined in the linked document (after easy-to-read media text there is a link to actual document I made, also here it is: https://uncertain-aqua-crawdad.myfilebase.com/ipfs/QmaMxWHoDvwc8YpxHvQju9um2AySkejG5yfYF94vdBCwZX).