Not voting is a vote for whoever won. That’s not like a complicated concept. Ambivalence means you’re cool with either result, and you’ve contributed to the end result by not contributing at all.
The problem is when people want to not vote and then complain about a result they don’t like. If you really don’t see a difference between Trump and Harris, but you’re not happy about the pedophilia, the rape, the military garrison enacting martial law, the higher taxes, lower wages, losing healthcare, kidnappings, and paving the rose garden, then you should have voted for something else.
Not voting is a vote for whoever won. That’s not like a complicated concept. Ambivalence means you’re cool with either result, and you’ve contributed to the end result by not contributing at all.
The problem is when people want to not vote and then complain about a result they don’t like. If you really don’t see a difference between Trump and Harris, but you’re not happy about the pedophilia, the rape, the military garrison enacting martial law, the higher taxes, lower wages, losing healthcare, kidnappings, and paving the rose garden, then you should have voted for something else.
Oh no, not the rose garden!
No, it’s a completely inaccurate one though.