• SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I’ve never heard of codeberg. Can someone explain what it is, briefly?

    Edit: I love being downvoted for asking a simple question. I thought I left reddit to get away from these twits.

  • Rav Sha'ul@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Is the term “far-right” used to mean anyone who doesn’t obey marching orders and won’t conform to opinions of others?

      • Rav Sha'ul@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yes, anarchists are leftists. I am asking about the context that people use the term “far right” as a collective insult. The common theme I see is it seems people are labelled “far right” as a tactic by those who live through the internet and not outside shaking hands with new people, done as tactic online to prevent anyone speaking bluntly that is not terrified of words, or disagreements and objections.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Dude, do you think a group that hates “diversity” in its every shape and form is just “moderate”?

      • Rav Sha'ul@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        There is no such thing as diversity if nobody is allowed to reject what you believe in, reject your opinions, a la “diverse opinions and beliefs”.

        • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Believing that certain groups must be eradicated isn’t covered under my tolerance of “diverse opinions”.

          • Rav Sha'ul@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            By your logic, you must show respect and acceptance to libertarians or anyone who follows religious teachings if they are not trying to punch or shoot anyone. Other than that, that’s what criminal law is for, to protect everyone from execution or assassination, but rejecting people, refusing to associate certain types of people because they find certain kind of people disgusting does not equate to planning mass murder.

            • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Do you think one should also show acceptance of highly defamatory speech, and only punish the very people that act out on them?

              • Rav Sha'ul@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Publicly banning opinions and beliefs is the fastest way to lead to murder and physical violence. Most commonly, murdering those that have been banned for not conforming. But if you can find other areas of personal interests and enjoyment to build friendships with people who disagree with your opinions, the collective whole is not so hostile.